Rhinoplasty.Istanbul Written, reviewed, dated
Our doctors
EN
Menu

Blog

What people mean when they say a nose job went wrong

The phrase covers four situations that have almost nothing in common. One is a medical complication and needs a doctor this week. One is a result that is not what somebody hoped for, and is a conversation rather than an emergency. One is a nose that simply has not finished settling, where the honest answer is to wait. And one is a decision taken on information that was wrong before anybody operated. Telling them apart is most of the work.

A woman in profile beside a pane of glass in a dark room, her face lit from the front and reflected faintly in the glass beside her.
Illustrative image, not a patient.

The short answers

Second operations, after a first
3.1%5,389 of 172,324 primary cases, in a cohort of 175,842 patients, followed for at least three years in three US states.
Second operations, after a revision
11.0%386 of 3,518 cases where the previous operation was itself a revision. This is a share of that 3,518, not of the whole cohort.
Before a shape is final
Twelve to eighteen monthsMeasured by three dimensional photographic assessment. A nose judged at three months is being judged early.
What nobody has measured
How often results are "bad"A revision rate counts second operations, which are decisions. It is not a count of poor outcomes, and it is not a success rate inverted.

If you are reading this at two in the morning a few weeks after an operation, the short version is that the swollen, hard, slightly crooked nose in the mirror at three weeks is not the nose you will keep, and that the things which genuinely need a doctor now are specific and mostly obvious. The warning signs are listed separately, and they are worth reading first.

One: a complication

This is the only urgent one, and the least common thing people mean by the phrase. A complication is a medical event: bleeding that does not stop, an infection, a collection of blood in the septum, an airway that has closed, a graft that has become exposed. Counted across institutions in national surgical datasets, rhinoplasty comes out as an operation with a low complication rate rather than a dangerous one. What matters to a reader is not the rate but the recognition: a septal haematoma is straightforward to drain in the first days and a cause of permanent collapse if it is left.

This is the one where waiting is the wrong instinct

Everywhere else on this page the advice is to give it time. Here it is the opposite. A fever, bleeding that soaks through, a sudden change in vision, increasing rather than decreasing pain, or a nose blocked and painful on one side, is a same day question for a doctor rather than a forum. The full list is here.

Two: a nose that has not finished

This is the most common thing people mean, and the one where the honest answer is least satisfying. Three dimensional photographic measurement puts the settling of a rhinoplasty at around twelve to eighteen months, with most change in the first few months, which is why a nose at three months looks close to finished and is not. The tip is slowest and is what people worry about. A tip that looks bulbous, hard or asymmetric early is describing swelling as much as surgery, and swelling is uneven: one side settles before the other, which reads as a mistake.

  • Hardness and numbness in the tip and upper lip are ordinary for months and resolve slowly.
  • Asymmetry that changes week to week is swelling. Asymmetry fixed over many months is structure.
  • A bump on the bridge early is often a callus at the bone cut rather than the hump returning.
  • Looking worse before better after the splint comes off is normal, and that day's photograph is the least representative anybody will take.

Three: a result that is not what you wanted

A settled nose that is technically sound and simply not what somebody hoped for is not a complication, and calling it one gets in the way of dealing with it. The causes vary: skin thicker than the plan allowed for, anatomy that limited what was possible, or an operation that did exactly what was agreed when what was agreed was wrong. The published data on second operations gives a sense of scale without answering the question. In a cohort of 175,842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty, followed at least three years across three American states, 3.1 per cent of primary cases went on to a further operation, which is 5,389 of 172,324. Where the previous operation was itself a revision, that was 11.0 per cent, which is 386 of 3,518 such cases.

A revision rate is not a failure rate, and the difference matters here

It counts people who chose a second operation and could get one, so it misses everybody who was unhappy and decided against more surgery, could not afford it, or went elsewhere and was counted by nobody. It also includes people whose first result was good and who wanted something different. It is a floor under one kind of dissatisfaction, not a measurement of how often rhinoplasty disappoints.

If this is where you are, what a second operation actually involves is the next page, and the short version is that it waits at least twelve months, is harder than the first, and usually needs cartilage from somewhere other than the nose.

Four: a decision made on information that was wrong

This is the only avoidable one, and the one this site is really about: a gallery that was not comparable, a technique called suitable when the deciding factor was which technique was on offer, or an operation agreed to without being told the limits of your own anatomy. It matters more when the surgery happened away from home, because follow up is where it surfaces. Guidance from the Royal College of Surgeons and the NHS agrees on the practical point: care after an operation abroad is not automatically continued at home, and a complication arriving after a flight lands in a system that did not plan the operation and does not hold the notes.

  • Get the operation note. What was done, with what, and where any graft came from. A revision surgeon works blind without it, and you are entitled to it.
  • Get the photographs, including the ones taken before.
  • Ask the original surgeon first. It is uncomfortable, and they know what they did, which nobody else does.

Sorting your own case

How to read a before and after covers what such photographs can establish, and applies to the galleries here as much as anyone else's.

Sources

Every source below was opened and checked. We link to health authorities, peer-reviewed journals and professional bodies, and to nothing else.

  1. Revision rates and risk factors of 175,842 patients undergoing septorhinoplastyJAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, via PubMed CentralThe largest published dataset on how often revision surgery is actually needed.
  2. Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after rhinoplasty: a multi-institutional ACS-NSQIP analysisThe Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, via PubMedLarge multi-institutional dataset on complication rates.
  3. Discovering the true resolution of postoperative swelling after rhinoplasty using 3-dimensional photographic assessmentPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, via PubMed CentralEvidence behind the twelve to eighteen month settling timeline quoted on this site.
  4. Septal perforationStatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf (National Library of Medicine)Clinical reference on a recognised complication of septal surgery.
  5. Cosmetic surgery abroadNHS, United KingdomNational health authority advice on the specific risks of travelling for surgery. Linked deliberately, because patients should read it.
  6. Thinking of having cosmetic surgery abroad?Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandIndependent professional guidance on questions to ask before travelling.